You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Precise Genome Editing of Drosophila with CRISPR RNA-Guided Cas9.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 22 |
| Book title |
CRISPR
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9_22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2686-2, 978-1-4939-2687-9
|
| Authors |
Gratz, Scott J, Harrison, Melissa M, Wildonger, Jill, O'Connor-Giles, Kate M, Scott J. Gratz, Melissa M. Harrison, Jill Wildonger, Kate M. O’Connor-Giles, Gratz, Scott J., Harrison, Melissa M., O’Connor-Giles, Kate M. |
| Editors |
Magnus Lundgren, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Peter C. Fineran |
| Abstract |
The readily programmable CRISPR-Cas9 system is transforming genome engineering. We and others have adapted the S. pyogenes CRISPR-Cas9 system to precisely engineer the Drosophila genome and demonstrated that these modifications are efficiently transmitted through the germline. Here we provide a detailed protocol for engineering small indels, defined deletions, and targeted insertion of exogenous DNA sequences within one month using a rapid DNA injection-based approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 36% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,547,155
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#464
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,008
of 356,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#28
of 1,000 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,000 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.