↓ Skip to main content

GET.ON Mood Enhancer: efficacy of Internet-based guided self-help compared to psychoeducation for depression: an investigator-blinded randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GET.ON Mood Enhancer: efficacy of Internet-based guided self-help compared to psychoeducation for depression: an investigator-blinded randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Daniel Ebert, Dirk Lehr, Harald Baumeister, Leif Boß, Heleen Riper, Pim Cuijpers, Jo Annika Reins, Claudia Buntrock, Matthias Berking

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) imposes a considerable disease burden on individuals and societies. A large number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the efficacy of Internet-based guided self-help interventions in reducing symptoms of depression. However, study quality varies considerably. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a new Internet-based guided self-help intervention (GET.ON Mood Enhancer) compared to online-based psychoeducation in an investigator-blinded RCT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 98 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Computer Science 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 45 21%