You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Attention! A good bedside test for delirium?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niamh A O'Regan, Daniel J Ryan, Eve Boland, Warren Connolly, Ciara McGlade, Maeve Leonard, Josie Clare, Joseph A Eustace, David Meagher, Suzanne Timmons |
| Abstract |
Routine delirium screening could improve delirium detection, but it remains unclear as to which screening tool is most suitable. We tested the diagnostic accuracy of the following screening methods (either individually or in combination) in the detection of delirium: MOTYB (months of the year backwards); SSF (Spatial Span Forwards); evidence of subjective or objective 'confusion'. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 25% |
| Spain | 6 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 25% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 30% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#997,219
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#334
of 7,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,513
of 235,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#3
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.