↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics for preventing gestational diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotics for preventing gestational diabetes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009951.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen L Barrett, Marloes Dekker Nitert, Louise S Conwell, Leonie K Callaway

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes for mother and infant. The prevention of GDM using lifestyle interventions has proven difficult. The gut microbiome (the composite of bacteria present in the intestines) influences host inflammatory pathways, glucose and lipid metabolism and, in other settings, alteration of the gut microbiome has been shown to impact on these host responses. Probiotics are one way of altering the gut microbiome but little is known about their use in influencing the metabolic environment of pregnancy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 290 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 23%
Student > Bachelor 46 16%
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 38 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 47 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#449,478
of 13,532,333 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,355
of 10,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,598
of 187,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,532,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.