You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-11-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ranjit M Anjana, Rajendra Pradeepa, Ashok K Das, Mohan Deepa, Anil Bhansali, Shashank R Joshi, Prashant P Joshi, Vinay K Dhandhania, Paturi V Rao, Vasudevan Sudha, Radhakrishnan Subashini, Ranjit Unnikrishnan, Sri V Madhu, Tanvir Kaur, Viswanathan Mohan, Deepak K Shukla, for the ICMR– INDIAB Collaborative Study Group |
| Abstract |
The rising prevalence of diabetes and obesity in India can be attributed, at least in part, to increasing levels of physical inactivity. However, there has been no nationwide survey in India on physical activity levels involving both the urban and rural areas in whole states of India. The aim of the present study was to assess physical activity patterns across India - as part of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 406 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 11% |
| Researcher | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 127 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 15% |
| Unknown | 143 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,008,256
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,201
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,140
of 221,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.