You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-017-0529-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin J Downes, Merehau C Mervin, Joshua M Byrnes, Paul A Scuffham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 67% |
| Scientists | 12 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 14% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 18% |
| Unknown | 86 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 98 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#558,632
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#63
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,526
of 327,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.