↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation for improving automobile driving after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation for improving automobile driving after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008357.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey George, Maria Crotty, Isabelle Gelinas, Hannes Devos

Abstract

Interventions to improve driving ability after stroke, including driving simulation and retraining visual skills, have limited evaluation of their effectiveness to guide policy and practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Unspecified 21 13%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 47 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 19%
Unspecified 27 17%
Psychology 15 9%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Other 29 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,114,243
of 13,243,534 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,905
of 10,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,410
of 188,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.