You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tocolytics for preterm premature rupture of membranes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007062.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A Dhanya Mackeen, Jolene Seibel‐Seamon, Jacqueline Muhammad, Jason K Baxter, Vincenzo Berghella |
Abstract |
In women with preterm labor, tocolysis has not been shown to improve perinatal mortality; however, it is often given for 48 hours to allow for the corticosteroid effect for fetal maturation. In women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), the use of tocolysis is still controversial. In theory, tocolysis may prolong pregnancy in women with PPROM, thereby allowing for the corticosteroid benefit and reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with prematurity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 311 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
Researcher | 33 | 11% |
Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Other | 78 | 25% |
Unknown | 80 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 34 | 11% |
Unknown | 85 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,782,944
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,525
of 236,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#158
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.