↓ Skip to main content

Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad…

Overview of attention for article published in Europace, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE)
Published in
Europace, July 2017
DOI 10.1093/europace/eux177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georges H Mairesse, Patrick Moran, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Christian Elsner, Marten Rosenqvist, Jonathan Mant, Amitava Banerjee, Bulent Gorenek, Johannes Brachmann, Niraj Varma, Gustavo Glotz de Lima, Jonathan Kalman, Neree Claes, Trudie Lobban, Deirdre Lane, Gregory Y H Lip, Giuseppe Boriani, Laurent Fauchier, Werner Jung, Irina Savelieva, Benedict Freedman, Shih Ann Chen, Rodrigo Isa, Mintu Turakhia, John Lewis Sapp, Gregory Lip, Bulent Gorenek, Christian Sticherling, Laurent Fauchier, A Goette, Werner Jung, Marc A Vos, Michele Brignole, Christian Elsner, Gheorghe-Andrei Dan, Francisco Marin, Giuseppe Boriani, Deirdre Lane, Carina Blomstrom Lundqvist, Irina Savelieva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 18%
Other 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Unknown 14 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Unspecified 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 14 64%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#492,671
of 13,853,697 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#66
of 1,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,804
of 264,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,853,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.