You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficiency of antenatal care and childbirth services in selected primary health care facilities in rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-96 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Happiness P Saronga, Els Duysburgh, Siriel Massawe, Maxwell A Dalaba, Germain Savadogo, Pencho Tonchev, Hengjin Dong, Rainer Sauerborn, Svetla Loukanova |
Abstract |
Cost studies are paramount for demonstrating how resources have been spent and identifying opportunities for more efficient use of resources. The main objective of this study was to assess the actual dimension and distribution of the costs of providing antenatal care (ANC) and childbirth services in selected rural primary health care facilities in Tanzania. In addition, the study analyzed determining factors of service provision efficiency in order to inform health policy and planning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 44 | 22% |
Researcher | 26 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
Other | 42 | 21% |
Unknown | 34 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Other | 37 | 18% |
Unknown | 41 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,451
of 7,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,763
of 221,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#122
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.