You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Airway management and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome in the CARES registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason McMullan, Ryan Gerecht, Jordan Bonomo, Rachel Robb, Bryan McNally, John Donnelly, Henry E. Wang, On behalf of the CARES Surveillance Group |
| Abstract |
Optimal out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) airway management strategies remain unclear. We compared OHCA outcomes between patients receiving endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus supraglottic airway (SGA), and between patients receiving [ETI or SGA] and those receiving no advanced airway. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 2% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 50 | 27% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#888,953
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#229
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,608
of 238,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.