↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
76 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Published in
CHEST, December 2015
DOI 10.1378/chest.126.3.845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas M.T. Cheung, Loretta Y.C. Yam, Loletta K.Y. So, Arthur C.W. Lau, Edwin Poon, Bernard M.H. Kong, Raymond W.H. Yung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Other 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 50 29%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#808,433
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#549
of 13,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,532
of 397,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#13
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.