↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Published in
CHEST, September 2004
DOI 10.1378/chest.126.3.845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas M.T. Cheung, Loretta Y.C. Yam, Loletta K.Y. So, Arthur C.W. Lau, Edwin Poon, Bernard M.H. Kong, Raymond W.H. Yung

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 38 28%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 33 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#409,606
of 15,956,496 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#282
of 9,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,086
of 268,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#8
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,956,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.