You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geodetic model of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from InSAR and GPS data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2017gl073580 |
| Authors |
D. Cheloni, V. De Novellis, M. Albano, A. Antonioli, M. Anzidei, S. Atzori, A. Avallone, C. Bignami, M. Bonano, S. Calcaterra, R. Castaldo, F. Casu, G. Cecere, C. De Luca, R. Devoti, D. Di Bucci, A. Esposito, A. Galvani, P. Gambino, R. Giuliani, R. Lanari, M. Manunta, M. Manzo, M. Mattone, A. Montuori, A. Pepe, S. Pepe, G. Pezzo, G. Pietrantonio, M. Polcari, F. Riguzzi, S. Salvi, V. Sepe, E. Serpelloni, G. Solaro, S. Stramondo, P. Tizzani, C. Tolomei, E. Trasatti, E. Valerio, I. Zinno, C. Doglioni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Scientists | 9 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 87 | 66% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#993,650
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#2,002
of 21,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,826
of 324,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#56
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.