↓ Skip to main content

Chronic hepatitis C treatment outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic hepatitis C treatment outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, February 2012
DOI 10.2471/blt.11.097147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan Ford, Catherine Kirby, Kasha Singh, Edward J Mills, Graham Cooke, Adeeba Kamarulzaman, Philipp duCros

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Other 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 10 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,609,310
of 17,365,229 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#1,858
of 3,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,786
of 273,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#33
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,365,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.