↓ Skip to main content

Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003134.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Spagnolo, Cinzia Del Giovane, Fabrizio Luppi, Stefania Cerri, Sara Balduzzi, E. Haydn Walters, Roberto D'Amico, Luca Richeldi

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic progressive lung disease with poor outcome and no effective treatment to date. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2003.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 18%
Other 27 13%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Chemistry 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 35 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,884,312
of 14,504,773 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,659
of 10,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,435
of 189,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,504,773 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.