↓ Skip to main content

Optimisation of rocker sole footwear for prevention of first plantar ulcer: comparison of group‐optimised and individually‐selected footwear designs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimisation of rocker sole footwear for prevention of first plantar ulcer: comparison of group‐optimised and individually‐selected footwear designs
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13047-017-0208-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen J. Preece, Jonathan D. Chapman, Bjoern Braunstein, Gert-Peter Brüggemann, Christopher J. Nester

Abstract

Appropriate footwear for individuals with diabetes but no ulceration history could reduce the risk of first ulceration. However, individuals who deem themselves at low risk are unlikely to seek out bespoke footwear which is personalised. Therefore, our primary aim was to investigate whether group-optimised footwear designs, which could be prefabricated and delivered in a retail setting, could achieve appropriate pressure reduction, or whether footwear selection must be on a patient-by-patient basis. A second aim was to compare responses to footwear design between healthy participants and people with diabetes in order to understand the transferability of previous footwear research, performed in healthy populations. Plantar pressures were recorded from 102 individuals with diabetes, considered at low risk of ulceration. This cohort included 17 individuals with peripheral neuropathy. We also collected data from 66 healthy controls. Each participant walked in 8 rocker shoe designs (4 apex positions × 2 rocker angles). ANOVA analysis was then used to understand the effect of two design features and descriptive statistics used to identify the group-optimised design. Using 200 kPa as a target, this group-optimised design was then compared to the design identified as the best for each participant (using plantar pressure data). Peak plantar pressure increased significantly as apex position was moved distally and rocker angle reduced (p < 0.001). The group-optimised design incorporated an apex at 52% of shoe length, a 20° rocker angle and an apex angle of 95°. With this design 71-81% of peak pressures were below the 200 kPa threshold, both in the full cohort of individuals with diabetes and also in the neuropathic subgroup. Importantly, only small increases (<5%) in this proportion were observed when participants wore footwear which was individually selected. In terms of optimised footwear designs, healthy participants demonstrated the same response as participants with diabetes, despite having lower plantar pressures. This is the first study demonstrating that a group-optimised, generic rocker shoe might perform almost as well as footwear selected on a patient by patient basis in a low risk patient group. This work provides a starting point for clinical evaluation of generic versus personalised pressure reducing footwear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 46 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 21%
Engineering 12 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 6%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 53 37%