The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1313490111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Colin K. Khoury, Anne D. Bjorkman, Hannes Dempewolf, Julian Ramirez-Villegas, Luigi Guarino, Andy Jarvis, Loren H. Rieseberg, Paul C. Struik |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 29 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 17 | 9% |
Netherlands | 9 | 5% |
Canada | 7 | 4% |
Brazil | 6 | 3% |
Australia | 5 | 3% |
France | 5 | 3% |
Colombia | 4 | 2% |
Mexico | 3 | 2% |
Other | 40 | 21% |
Unknown | 67 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 141 | 73% |
Scientists | 35 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 1% |
Germany | 6 | <1% |
Colombia | 6 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
Italy | 5 | <1% |
Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
Brazil | 4 | <1% |
Argentina | 4 | <1% |
Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
Other | 33 | 2% |
Unknown | 1516 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 316 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 257 | 16% |
Student > Master | 225 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 143 | 9% |
Other | 73 | 5% |
Other | 257 | 16% |
Unknown | 334 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 529 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 220 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 111 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 58 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 3% |
Other | 234 | 15% |
Unknown | 407 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 717. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#30,699
of 26,669,772 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#883
of 105,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159
of 237,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10
of 1,002 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,669,772 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,002 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.