↓ Skip to main content

A practical and systematic approach to organisational capacity strengthening for research in the health sector in Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A practical and systematic approach to organisational capacity strengthening for research in the health sector in Africa
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-12-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imelda Bates, Alan Boyd, Helen Smith, Donald C Cole

Abstract

Despite increasing investment in health research capacity strengthening efforts in low and middle income countries, published evidence to guide the systematic design and monitoring of such interventions is very limited. Systematic processes are important to underpin capacity strengthening interventions because they provide stepwise guidance and allow for continual improvement. Our objective here was to use evidence to inform the design of a replicable but flexible process to guide health research capacity strengthening that could be customized for different contexts, and to provide a framework for planning, collecting information, making decisions, and improving performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ghana 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 172 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 25 14%
Other 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 48 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Social Sciences 37 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 50 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,888,673
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#239
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,745
of 223,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.