↓ Skip to main content

How the vertebrates were made: selective pruning of a double-duplicated genome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How the vertebrates were made: selective pruning of a double-duplicated genome
Published in
BMC Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-8-144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Manning, Eric Scheeff

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 39%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 75%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2010.
All research outputs
#1,121,247
of 8,010,881 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#382
of 866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,442
of 105,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,010,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.