↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the clinical and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol microemulsion in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the clinical and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol microemulsion in dogs
Published in
Ciência Rural, June 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0103-84782013000600026
Authors

André Luís Corrêa, Renato Batista Tamanho, Aury Nunes de Moraes, Suzane Lilian Beier, Doughlas Regalin, Felipe Hertzing Farias, Pâmela Spolti, Nilson Oleskovicz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 5 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,935,999
of 8,014,601 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#119
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,857
of 105,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,014,601 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them