You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Morfogênese de gramíneas nativas do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil) submetidas a pastoreio rotativo durante primavera e verão
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-84782014000100016 |
Authors |
Aline Bosak dos Santos, Fernando Luiz Ferreira de Quadros, Anna Carolina Cerato Confortin, Liane Seibert, Bruna San Martim Rolim Ribeiro, Paula de Oliveira Severo, Pedro Trindade Casanova, Greice Kelly Gomes Machado |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,057
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,470
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.