↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004715.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen R Mujakperuo, Margaret Watson, Roderick Morrison, Tatiana V Macfarlane

Abstract

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of disorders affecting the temporomandibular joints and the muscles of mastication. TMDs are treated with a wide range of drugs. The extent to which the use of these drugs is based upon evidence is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 292 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 64 21%
Unknown 75 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 87 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,954,834
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,215
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,984
of 108,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.