↓ Skip to main content

Combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005427.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce F Walker, Simon D French, William Grant, Sally Green

Abstract

Chiropractors commonly use a combination of interventions to treat people with low-back pain (LBP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 135 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 53 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 62%
Unspecified 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 21 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#183,657
of 12,358,022 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#410
of 8,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#946
of 86,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,358,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.