↓ Skip to main content

Combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005427.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce F Walker, Simon D French, William Grant, Sally Green

Abstract

Chiropractors commonly use a combination of interventions to treat people with low-back pain (LBP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 177 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 20%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 30 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#246,453
of 15,394,227 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#553
of 11,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,056
of 92,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,394,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.