You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006396.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Tikka, Jos H Verbeek, Erik Kateman, Thais C Morata, Wouter A Dreschler, Silvia Ferrite |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 90% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 461 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 13% |
| Researcher | 44 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 167 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 14% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 3% |
| Psychology | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 73 | 16% |
| Unknown | 179 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#743,621
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,386
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,198
of 325,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.