↓ Skip to main content

Reassessing rainfall in the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico: Local and global ecohydrological implications

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reassessing rainfall in the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico: Local and global ecohydrological implications
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0180987
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheila F. Murphy, Robert F. Stallard, Martha A. Scholl, Grizelle González, Angel J. Torres-Sánchez

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Engineering 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,346,487
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#76,647
of 195,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,700
of 313,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,387
of 4,025 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,025 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.