↓ Skip to main content

Aspirin for in vitro fertilisation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspirin for in vitro fertilisation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004832.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siristatidis CS, Dodd SR, Drakeley AJ

Abstract

Aspirin is used to improve the outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation despite inconsistent evidence of its efficacy. The most appropriate time to commence aspirin therapy and the length of treatment required are also still to be determined. This is an update of the review first published in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,345,531
of 12,128,183 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,988
of 8,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,036
of 90,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,128,183 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.