↓ Skip to main content

Can analyst coverage reduce the incidence of fraud? Evidence from China

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Economics Letters, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can analyst coverage reduce the incidence of fraud? Evidence from China
Published in
Applied Economics Letters, March 2014
DOI 10.1080/13504851.2013.879273
Authors

May Hu, Jingjing Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Lecturer 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 31%
Computer Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,970,674
of 4,506,837 outputs
Outputs from Applied Economics Letters
#219
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,558
of 107,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Economics Letters
#13
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.