↓ Skip to main content

Morphology and distribution of the ampullary electroreceptors in wobbegong sharks: implications for feeding behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphology and distribution of the ampullary electroreceptors in wobbegong sharks: implications for feeding behaviour
Published in
Marine Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00227-010-1595-1
Authors

Susan M. Theiss, Shaun P. Collin, Nathan S. Hart

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Unspecified 6 11%
Other 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 71%
Unspecified 7 13%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2011.
All research outputs
#2,904,208
of 3,628,259 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#621
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,503
of 55,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.