↓ Skip to main content

Timing and volume of fluid administration for patients with bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing and volume of fluid administration for patients with bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002245.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene Kwan, Frances Bunn, Paul Chinnock, Ian Roberts

Abstract

Treatment of haemorrhagic shock involves maintaining blood pressure and tissue perfusion until bleeding is controlled. Different resuscitation strategies have been used to maintain the blood pressure in trauma patients until bleeding is controlled. However, while maintaining blood pressure may prevent shock, it may worsen bleeding.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Andorra 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 22%
Other 22 13%
Student > Master 21 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 43 25%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 26 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#506,000
of 13,777,184 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,507
of 10,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,309
of 188,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,777,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.