↓ Skip to main content

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Human Reward System for Major Depression|[mdash]|Rationale, Outcomes and Outlook

Overview of attention for article published in this source, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

3 news outlets
2 blogs
19 tweeters
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

109 Mendeley
1 CiteULike
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Human Reward System for Major Depression|[mdash]|Rationale, Outcomes and Outlook
Published by
Nature Publishing Group, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/npp.2014.28
Pubmed ID

Thomas E Schlaepfer, Bettina H Bewernick, Sarah Kayser, Rene Hurlemann, Volker A Coenen, Schlaepfer TE, Bewernick BH, Kayser S, Hurlemann R, Coenen VA


Deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a putative approach for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has now been researched for about a decade. Several uncontrolled studies--all in relatively small patient populations and different target regions-have shown clinically relevant antidepressant effects in about half of the patients and very recently, DBS to a key structure of the reward system, the medial forebrain bundle, has yielded promising results within few days of stimulation and at much lower stimulation intensities. On the downside, DBS procedures in regions are associated with surgical risks (eg, hemorrhage) and psychiatric complications (suicidal attenuation, hypomania) as well as high costs. This overview summarizes research on the mechanisms of brain networks with respect to psychiatric diseases and--as a novelty--extrapolates to the role of the reward system in DBS for patients with treatment-resistant depression. It further evaluates relevant methodological aspects of today's research in DBS for TRD. On the scientific side, the reward system has an important yet clearly under-recognized role in both neurobiology and treatment of depression. On the methodological side of DBS research in TRD, better animal models are clearly needed to explain clinical effects of DBS in TRD. Larger sample sizes, long-term follow-up and designs including blinded sham control are required to draw final conclusions on efficacy and side effects. Practical research issues cover study design, patient tracking, and the discussion of meaningful secondary outcome measures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 2%
Researcher 2 2%
Student > Postgraduate 1 <1%
Professor 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 101 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Unknown 101 93%