↓ Skip to main content

Achieving Population-Level Change Through a System-Contextual Approach to Supporting Competent Parenting

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Achieving Population-Level Change Through a System-Contextual Approach to Supporting Competent Parenting
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10567-017-0227-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew R. Sanders, Kylie Burke, Ronald J. Prinz, Alina Morawska

Abstract

The quality of parenting children receive affects a diverse range of child and youth outcomes. Addressing the quality of parenting on a broad scale is a critical part of producing a more nurturing society. To achieve a meaningful population-level reduction in the prevalence rates of child maltreatment and social and emotional problems that are directly or indirectly influenced by parenting practices requires the adoption of a broad ecological perspective in supporting families to raise children. We make the case for adopting a multilevel, whole of population approach to enhance competent parenting and describe the essential tasks that must be accomplished for the approach to be successful and its effects measurable. We describe how a theoretically integrated system of parenting support based on social learning and cognitive behavioral principles can be further strengthened when the broader community supports parental participation. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 29%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,560,343
of 24,503,376 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#247
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,403
of 315,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.