↓ Skip to main content

Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009740.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Claude Lavoie, Jos H Verbeek, Manisha Pahwa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Psychology 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 8 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#893,556
of 14,558,842 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,682
of 11,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,544
of 186,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,558,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.