The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A cross-sectional community study of post-traumatic stress disorder and social support in Lao People's Democratic Republic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.2471/blt.12.115311 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bouavanh Southivong, Masao Ichikawa, Shinji Nakahara, Chanhpheng Southivong |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#259
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,061
of 211,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them