You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A cross-sectional community study of post-traumatic stress disorder and social support in Lao People's Democratic Republic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.2471/blt.12.115311 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bouavanh Southivong, Masao Ichikawa, Shinji Nakahara, Chanhpheng Southivong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#2,219
of 4,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,467
of 199,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#31
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.