You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing communication quality of consultations in primary care: initial reliability of the Global Consultation Rating Scale, based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide to the Medical Interview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenni Burt, Gary Abel, Natasha Elmore, John Campbell, Martin Roland, John Benson, Jonathan Silverman |
| Abstract |
To investigate initial reliability of the Global Consultation Rating Scale (GCRS: an instrument to assess the effectiveness of communication across an entire doctor-patient consultation, based on the Calgary-Cambridge guide to the medical interview), in simulated patient consultations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 88% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 18% |
| Unknown | 68 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#10,985
of 25,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,387
of 235,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#126
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.