↓ Skip to main content

Climate Field Reconstruction under Stationary and Nonstationary Forcing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Climate, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Climate Field Reconstruction under Stationary and Nonstationary Forcing
Published in
Journal of Climate, February 2003
DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0462:cfrusa>2.0.co;2
Authors

S. Rutherford, M. E. Mann, T. L. Delworth, R. J. Stouffer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 51%
Environmental Science 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Climate
#3,862
of 7,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,059
of 127,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Climate
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.