# Novel Interpretation of the “ Θ+(1540) Pentaquark” Peak

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, August 2010

• In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
• High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
• High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

blogs
1 blog
reddit
1 Redditor

## Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title Novel Interpretation of the “ Θ+(1540) Pentaquark” Peak Physical Review Letters, August 2010 10.1103/physrevlett.105.092001 A. Martínez Torres, E. Oset We use a theoretical model of the $\gamma ~d \to ~K^+ K^- ~n ~p$ reaction adapted to the experiment done at LEPS where a peak was observed and associated to the $\Theta^{+}(1540)$ pentaquark. The study shows that the method used in the experiment to associate momenta to the undetected proton and neutron, together with the chosen cuts, necessarily creates an artificial broad peak in the assumed $K^+ n$ invariant mass in the region of the claimed $\Theta^{+}(1540)$, such that the remaining strength seen for the experimental peak is compatible with a fluctuation of 2$\sigma$ significance.

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

### Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

### Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 100%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 133%

## Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2011.
All research outputs
#318,751
of 3,616,387 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#2,032
of 11,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,925
of 55,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#36
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,616,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.