↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Stratified Care for Low Back Pain in Family Practice (IMPaCT Back): A Prospective Population-Based Sequential Comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Family Medicine, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Stratified Care for Low Back Pain in Family Practice (IMPaCT Back): A Prospective Population-Based Sequential Comparison
Published in
Annals of Family Medicine, March 2014
DOI 10.1370/afm.1625
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine E. Foster, Ricky Mullis, Jonathan C. Hill, Martyn Lewis, David G. T. Whitehurst, Carol Doyle, Kika Konstantinou, Chris Main, Simon Somerville, Gail Sowden, Simon Wathall, Julie Young, Elaine M. Hay

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effects of implementing risk-stratified care for low back pain in family practice on physician's clinical behavior, patient outcomes, and costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 295 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Researcher 35 12%
Other 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Other 68 23%
Unknown 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 20%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 67 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#944,011
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#413
of 1,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,054
of 235,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.