↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Stratified Care for Low Back Pain in Family Practice (IMPaCT Back): A Prospective Population-Based Sequential Comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Family Medicine, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Stratified Care for Low Back Pain in Family Practice (IMPaCT Back): A Prospective Population-Based Sequential Comparison
Published in
Annals of Family Medicine, March 2014
DOI 10.1370/afm.1625
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine E. Foster, Ricky Mullis, Jonathan C. Hill, Martyn Lewis, David G. T. Whitehurst, Carol Doyle, Kika Konstantinou, Chris Main, Simon Somerville, Gail Sowden, Simon Wathall, Julie Young, Elaine M. Hay, Foster NE, Mullis R, Hill JC, Lewis M, Whitehurst DG, Doyle C, Konstantinou K, Main C, Somerville S, Sowden G, Wathall S, Young J, Hay EM, N. E. Foster, R. Mullis, J. C. Hill, M. Lewis, D. G. T. Whitehurst, C. Doyle, K. Konstantinou, C. Main, S. Somerville, G. Sowden, S. Wathall, J. Young, E. M. Hay

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effects of implementing risk-stratified care for low back pain in family practice on physician's clinical behavior, patient outcomes, and costs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 189 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Researcher 31 16%
Other 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 11%
Other 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 20%
Unspecified 19 10%
Psychology 12 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 30 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#354,913
of 13,727,939 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#188
of 1,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,811
of 188,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,727,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.