You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Stratified Care for Low Back Pain in Family Practice (IMPaCT Back): A Prospective Population-Based Sequential Comparison
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Family Medicine, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1370/afm.1625 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nadine E. Foster, Ricky Mullis, Jonathan C. Hill, Martyn Lewis, David G. T. Whitehurst, Carol Doyle, Kika Konstantinou, Chris Main, Simon Somerville, Gail Sowden, Simon Wathall, Julie Young, Elaine M. Hay |
Abstract |
We aimed to determine the effects of implementing risk-stratified care for low back pain in family practice on physician's clinical behavior, patient outcomes, and costs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
Spain | 2 | 15% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 295 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
Researcher | 35 | 12% |
Other | 34 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
Other | 68 | 23% |
Unknown | 57 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 20% |
Psychology | 11 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 2% |
Other | 39 | 13% |
Unknown | 67 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#944,011
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#413
of 1,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,054
of 235,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.