You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thematic series on biomedical ontologies in JBMS: challenges and new directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2041-1480-5-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Hoehndorf, Melissa Haendel, Robert Stevens, Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann |
| Abstract |
Over the past 15 years, the biomedical research community has increased its efforts to produce ontologies encoding biomedical knowledge, and to provide the corresponding infrastructure to maintain them. As ontologies are becoming a central part of biological and biomedical research, a communication channel to publish frequent updates and latest developments on them would be an advantage. Here, we introduce the JBMS thematic series on Biomedical Ontologies. The aim of the series is to disseminate the latest developments in research on biomedical ontologies and provide a venue for publishing newly developed ontologies, updates to existing ontologies as well as methodological advances, and selected contributions from conferences and workshops. We aim to give this thematic series a central role in the exploration of ongoing research in biomedical ontologies and intend to work closely together with the research community towards this aim. Researchers and working groups are encouraged to provide feedback on novel developments and special topics to be integrated into the existing publication cycles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 31 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 33% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#240
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,668
of 235,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.