You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing post solid organ transplant tuberculosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008597.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bappa Adamu, Aliyu Abdu, Abdullahi A Abba, Musa M Borodo, Imad M Tleyjeh |
Abstract |
Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of infection as a result of immunosuppression caused inadvertently by medical treatment. Tuberculosis (TB) is a challenging infection to manage among organ transplant recipients that can be transmitted from infected people or triggered from latent infection. Organ transplant recipients have been reported to be up to 300 times more likely to develop TB than the general population. Consensus about the use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post solid organ transplant TB has not been achieved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 29% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 217 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
Researcher | 20 | 9% |
Other | 17 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
Other | 48 | 22% |
Unknown | 73 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 9% |
Unknown | 85 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,408,362
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,706
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,664
of 236,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.