↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing post solid organ transplant tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing post solid organ transplant tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008597.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bappa Adamu, Aliyu Abdu, Abdullahi A Abba, Musa M Borodo, Imad M Tleyjeh

Abstract

Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of infection as a result of immunosuppression caused inadvertently by medical treatment. Tuberculosis (TB) is a challenging infection to manage among organ transplant recipients that can be transmitted from infected people or triggered from latent infection. Organ transplant recipients have been reported to be up to 300 times more likely to develop TB than the general population. Consensus about the use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post solid organ transplant TB has not been achieved.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 217 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 20 9%
Other 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 73 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 85 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,408,362
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,706
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,664
of 236,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.