You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating Biological and Social Values When Prioritizing Places for Biodiversity Conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12257 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
AMY L. WHITEHEAD, HEINI KUJALA, CHRISTOPHER D. IVES, ASCELIN GORDON, PIA E. LENTINI, BRENDAN A. WINTLE, EMILY NICHOLSON, CHRISTOPHER M. RAYMOND |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 7% |
| Finland | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 60% |
| Scientists | 14 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 362 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 93 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 66 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 160 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 65 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,291,309
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#736
of 4,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,512
of 239,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#14
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.