↓ Skip to main content

Zebrafish as a Natural Host Model for Vibrio cholerae Colonization and Transmission

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Zebrafish as a Natural Host Model for Vibrio cholerae Colonization and Transmission
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2014
DOI 10.1128/aem.03580-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna L. Runft, Kristie C. Mitchell, Basel H. Abuaita, Jonathan P. Allen, Sarah Bajer, Kevin Ginsburg, Melody N. Neely, Jeffrey H. Withey

Abstract

The human diarrheal disease cholera is caused by the aquatic bacterium Vibrio cholerae. V. cholerae in the environment is associated with several varieties of aquatic life, including insect egg masses, shellfish, and vertebrate fish. Here we describe a novel animal model for V. cholerae, the zebrafish. Pandemic V. cholerae strains specifically colonize the zebrafish intestinal tract after exposure in water with no manipulation of the animal required. Colonization occurs in close contact with the intestinal epithelium and mimics colonization observed in mammals. Zebrafish that are colonized by V. cholerae transmit the bacteria to naive fish, which then become colonized. Striking differences in colonization between V. cholerae classical and El Tor biotypes were apparent. The zebrafish natural habitat in Asia heavily overlaps areas where cholera is endemic, suggesting that zebrafish and V. cholerae evolved in close contact with each other. Thus, the zebrafish provides a natural host model for the study of V. cholerae colonization, transmission, and environmental survival.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,715,061
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#15,603
of 17,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,344
of 222,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#119
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.