↓ Skip to main content

Carbohydrate mouth rinse: does it improve endurance exercise performance?

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbohydrate mouth rinse: does it improve endurance exercise performance?
Published in
Nutrition Journal, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-9-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vitor de Salles Painelli, Humberto Nicastro, Antonio H Lancha

Abstract

It is well known that carbohydrate (CHO) supplementation can improve performance in endurance exercises through several mechanisms such as maintenance of glycemia and sparing endogenous glycogen as well as the possibility of a central nervous-system action. Some studies have emerged in recent years in order to test the hypothesis of ergogenic action via central nervous system. Recent studies have demonstrated that CHO mouth rinse can lead to improved performance of cyclists, and this may be associated with the activation of brain areas linked to motivation and reward. These findings have already been replicated in other endurance modalities, such as running. This alternative seems to be an attractive nutritional tool to improve endurance exercise performance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 139 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 30%
Student > Master 31 20%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 68 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 11 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2020.
All research outputs
#481,756
of 16,019,981 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#166
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,222
of 93,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,019,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them