↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Effects of the Very-Low-Carbohydrate Diets: Misunderstood "Villains" of Human Metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 869)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
195 tweeters
facebook
60 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
14 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
7 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Effects of the Very-Low-Carbohydrate Diets: Misunderstood "Villains" of Human Metabolism
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-1-2-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anssi H Manninen

Abstract

During very low carbohydrate intake, the regulated and controlled production of ketone bodies causes a harmless physiological state known as dietary ketosis. Ketone bodies flow from the liver to extra-hepatic tissues (e.g., brain) for use as a fuel; this spares glucose metabolism via a mechanism similar to the sparing of glucose by oxidation of fatty acids as an alternative fuel. In comparison with glucose, the ketone bodies are actually a very good respiratory fuel. Indeed, there is no clear requirement for dietary carbohydrates for human adults. Interestingly, the effects of ketone body metabolism suggest that mild ketosis may offer therapeutic potential in a variety of different common and rare disease states. Also, the recent landmark study showed that a very-low-carbohydrate diet resulted in a significant reduction in fat mass and a concomitant increase in lean body mass in normal-weight men. Contrary to popular belief, insulin is not needed for glucose uptake and utilization in man. Finally, both muscle fat and carbohydrate burn in an amino acid flame.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 430 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 116 26%
Student > Master 73 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 10%
Other 39 9%
Researcher 34 8%
Other 90 20%
Unknown 54 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 12%
Sports and Recreations 51 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 10%
Other 78 17%
Unknown 61 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 276. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#96,668
of 21,777,067 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#40
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276
of 106,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,777,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them