You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Principal components analysis based control of a multi-dof underactuated prosthetic hand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-7-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia C Matrone, Christian Cipriani, Emanuele L Secco, Giovanni Magenes, Maria Chiara Carrozza |
| Abstract |
Functionality, controllability and cosmetics are the key issues to be addressed in order to accomplish a successful functional substitution of the human hand by means of a prosthesis. Not only the prosthesis should duplicate the human hand in shape, functionality, sensorization, perception and sense of body-belonging, but it should also be controlled as the natural one, in the most intuitive and undemanding way. At present, prosthetic hands are controlled by means of non-invasive interfaces based on electromyography (EMG). Driving a multi degrees of freedom (DoF) hand for achieving hand dexterity implies to selectively modulate many different EMG signals in order to make each joint move independently, and this could require significant cognitive effort to the user. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Fiji | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 30% |
| Researcher | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 85 | 56% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,775,845
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#411
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,027
of 95,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them