↓ Skip to main content

Correction: The complex genetics of gait speed: genome-wide meta-analysis approach

Overview of attention for article published in Aging, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: The complex genetics of gait speed: genome-wide meta-analysis approach
Published in
Aging, July 2017
DOI 10.18632/aging.101260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Ben-Avraham, David Karasik, Joe Verghese, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Jennifer A. Smith, John D. Eicher, Rotem Vered, Joris Deelen, Alice M. Arnold, Aron S. Buchman, Toshiko Tanaka, Jessica D. Faul, Maria Nethander, Myriam Fornage, Hieab H. Adams, Amy M. Matteini, Michele L. Callisaya, Albert V. Smith, Lei Yu, Philip L. De Jager, Denis A. Evans, Vilmundur Gudnason, Albert Hofman, Alison Pattie, Janie Corley, Lenore J. Launer, Davis S. Knopman, Neeta Parimi, Stephen T. Turner, Stefania Bandinelli, Marian Beekman, Danielle Gutman, Lital Sharvit, Simon P. Mooijaart, David C. Liewald, Jeanine J. Houwing-Duistermaat, Claes Ohlsson, Matthijs Moed, Vincent J. Verlinden, Dan Mellström, Jos N. van der Geest, Magnus Karlsson, Dena Hernandez, Rebekah McWhirter, Yongmei Liu, Russell Thomson, Gregory J. Tranah, Andre G. Uitterlinden, David R. Weir, Wei Zhao, John M. Starr, Andrew D. Johnson, M. Arfan Ikram, David A. Bennett, Steven R. Cummings, Ian J. Deary, Tamara B. Harris, Sharon L. R. Kardia, Thomas H. Mosley, Velandai K. Srikanth, Beverly G. Windham, Ann B. Newman, Jeremy D. Walston, Gail Davies, Daniel S. Evans, Eline P. Slagboom, Luigi Ferrucci, Douglas P. Kiel, Joanne M. Murabito, Gil Atzmon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 41%
Unspecified 6 35%
Professor 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,207,251
of 11,459,905 outputs
Outputs from Aging
#259
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,480
of 258,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,459,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.