↓ Skip to main content

Prognosis following a diagnosis of heart failure and the role of primary care: a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Prognosis following a diagnosis of heart failure and the role of primary care: a review of the literature
Published in
BJGP Open, July 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen17x101013
Authors

Nicholas R Jones, FD Richard Hobbs, Clare J Taylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#656,177
of 9,722,874 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#14
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,902
of 254,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,722,874 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.