↓ Skip to main content

Super-insulate or use renewable technology? Life cycle cost, energy and global warming potential analysis of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) in a temperate oceanic climate

Overview of attention for article published in Energy & Buildings, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Super-insulate or use renewable technology? Life cycle cost, energy and global warming potential analysis of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) in a temperate oceanic climate
Published in
Energy & Buildings, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.029
Authors

Paul Moran, Jamie Goggins, Magdalena Hajdukiewicz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 77 47%
Energy 17 10%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 40 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,473,124
of 12,292,436 outputs
Outputs from Energy & Buildings
#248
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,872
of 264,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy & Buildings
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,292,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.