↓ Skip to main content

How Should Clinicians Counsel a Woman with a Strong Family History of Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease about Her Pregnancy?

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Clinicians Counsel a Woman with a Strong Family History of Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease about Her Pregnancy?
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.7.ecas4-1707
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Counseling patients regarding the benefits, harms, and dilemmas of genetic testing is one of the greatest ethical challenges facing reproductive medicine today. With or without test results, clinicians grapple with how to communicate potential genetic risks as patients weigh their reproductive options. Here, we consider a case of a woman with a strong family history of early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). She is early in her pregnancy and unsure about learning her own genetic status. We address the ethical ramifications of each of her options, which include genetic testing, genetic counseling, and termination versus continuation of the pregnancy. Our analysis foregrounds clinicians' role in helping to ensure autonomous decision making as the patient reflects on these clinical options in light of her goals and values.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Student > Master 4 33%
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%