You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of complementary feeding practices in South Asian infants and young children: the Bangladesh perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nutrition, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40795-017-0176-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Logan Manikam, Alexandra Robinson, Jia Ying Kuah, Hrisheekesh J. Vaidya, Emma C. Alexander, George W. Miller, Kunjshri K. Singh, Victoria Dawe, Sonia Ahmed, Raghu Lingam, Monica Lakhanpaul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 72 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,817,485
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nutrition
#69
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,916
of 314,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nutrition
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.