↓ Skip to main content

Plant stem cells in cosmetics: current trends and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Future Science OA, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant stem cells in cosmetics: current trends and future directions
Published in
Future Science OA, November 2017
DOI 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Trehan, Bozena Michniak-Kohn, Kavita Beri

Abstract

Plant regeneration at the cellular and tissue level is a unique process. Similar to animals, the stem cells in plants have properties that help stimulate and regenerate plants after injury. The unique properties of plant stem cells have been a recent area of interest and focus both in developing new cosmetics and studying how these extracts/phytohormones will influence animal skin. This special report focuses on the current evidence-based trends in plant stem cell-based cosmetics and sheds light on the challenges that we need to overcome in order to see meaningful changes in human skin using topical cosmetics derived from plant stem cells.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 30%
Student > Master 14 22%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Chemistry 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 11 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,615,803
of 15,936,481 outputs
Outputs from Future Science OA
#62
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,040
of 267,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Future Science OA
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,936,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.